MPD Fully Functioning During the Covid-19 Emergency

We just thought we’d let all of you know that it is business as usual at Octagon Communications and MPD. All necessary precautions have been taken, and, as several of our staffers already work remotely, the office is open for business until we are told otherwise.

The March issues of MPD and MMD will arrive on schedule, and of course our website and the digital edition will continue to be available.

Feel free to contact any of us with questions or concerns!

We hope that you and your families are safe and healthy.

Home Featured Articles Circuit Designer’s Notebook: Effective Capacitance vs Frequency

# Circuit Designer’s Notebook: Effective Capacitance vs Frequency

892
0

by Richard Fiore, Director, RF Applications Engineering – American Technical Ceramics Corp.

It is generally assumed that the capacitance value selected from a vendor’s catalog is constant over frequency. This is essentially true for applications with applied frequencies that are well below the capacitor’0s self-resonant frequency. However, as the operating frequency approaches the capacitor’s self-resonant frequency, the capacitance value will appear to increase, resulting in an effective capacitance (CE) that is larger than the nominal capacitance. This article will address the details of effective capacitance as a function of the application operating frequency. In order to illustrate this phenomenon, a simplified lumped element model of a capacitor connected to a frequency source operating in a network will be considered, as depicted in Figure 1.

This model has been selected because the effective capacitance is largely a function of the net reactance developed between the capacitor and its parasitic series inductance (LS). The equivalent series resistance “ESR”shown in this illustration does not have a significant effect on the effective capacitance.

Effective Capacitance:

The nominal capacitance value (CO) is established by a measurement performed at 1 MHz. In typical RF applications, the applied frequency is generally much higher than the 1 MHz measurement frequency, hence at these frequencies, the inductive reactance (XL) associated with the parasitic series inductance (LS) becomes significantly large as compared to the capacitive reactance (XC). Figure 2 illustrates that there is a disproportionate increase in XL as compared to XC with increasing frequencies. This results in an effective capacitance that is greater than the nominal capacitance. Finally, at the capacitor’s series resonant frequency, the two reactances are equal and opposite, yielding a net reactance of zero. The expression for CE becomes undefined at this frequency.

As illustrated in Figure 1, the physical capacitor can be represented as CO in series with LS. The impedance of the series combination of CO and LS can then be set equal to CE, which may be referred to as an “ideal equivalent” capacitor. This will yield the following equation:

j (ω LS – 1/ω C0) = – j 1/ω CE
ω2 LS – 1/C0 = – 1/CE

The relationship between the operating frequency F0 and the effective capacitance CE can then be stated as:

CE = C0/(1 – ω2 LS C0)
CE = C0/[1 – (2π F0)2 LS C0]

Where:

CE = Effective Capacitance at the application frequency, (F0)

C0 = Nominal Capacitance at 1 MHz

LS = Parasitic Inductance, (H)

F0 = Operating Frequency, (Hz)

From this relationship, it can be seen that as the applied frequency increases, the denominator becomes smaller, thereby yielding a larger effective capacitance. At the capacitor’s series resonant frequency, the denominator goes to zero and the expression becomes undefined. The relationship of CE vs frequency is a hyperbolic function as illustrated in Figure 3.

Example:

Consider an ATC 100A series 100pF capacitor.

Calculate the effective capacitance (CE) at 10MHz, 100MHz, 500MHz, 900MHz, 950MHz.

Solution: Calculate by using the relationship:
CE = C0/[1– (2π F0) 2 LS C0]. Refer to Table 1. 