Editorial

Uncertain Times for DefenseADCs and DACs Penetrate Sacred Ground
By Barry Manz

The impact of converting analog signals to digital form is one of the greatest advances the electronics industry has ever achieved.
Read More...

 
 
Defense News

Northrop Grumman MMICs Speed AEHF Production
Northrop Grumman has fabricated more than 36,000 MMICs covering frequencies from 300 MHz to 300 GHz for the U.S. Air Force's fifth and sixth Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) satellites, speeding production of both spacecraft, according to Space Daily.

Article Highlights China Cruise Missile Threat
While the world focuses on China’s ballistic missiles, the country is rapidly developing advanced capabilities for its cruise missiles, according to The National Interest. This is occurring at the same time the U.S. Navy has limited the type and quantity of its own anti-ship cruise missiles, according to the article.

Iran Claims It Reverse-Engineered RQ-170 UAV
Iran says it has copied announced on Sunday that it has copied an RQ-170 Sentinel UAV that it says the country "commandeered" in 2011, after his allegedly being "brought down by the Iranian Armed Forces' electronic warfare unit" in December 2011, according to Iran's Tasnim News Agency. That Iran captured the UAV is not in doubt: U.S. President Barack Obama asked Iran sent to return it after it was captured.

Israeli Navy Gaining Greater Capabilities
The Israel Navy has begun a program to enhance its sea-to-surface missile capabilities, a senior naval source told The Jerusalem Post, who said that the efforts were part of a planned program to increase the role of the navy in integrated warfare capabilities.

House House to Keep A-10, Other Programs
The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) is opted to fund a broad array of projects and has stated its goal of protecting every possible defense system. For example, the committee left the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter largely intact and up the funding for Boeing's EA-18G Growler electronic attack aircraft.

EW Development Key Element of 2015 Budget
The proposed defense budget may be leaned out but electronic warfare will receive considerable funding as the need for it is growing, according to an interesting story in the LA Times.

Insight into Hypersonic Weapons
An article in The Interpreter published by the Lowy Institute for International Policy contains an interview by Harry Kazianis, a non-resident senior fellow at the China Policy Institute (University of Nottingham) with John Stillion, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) into the workings of hypersonic weapons.

September 2013

Multi-function Systems Inching Closer

Combining the functional resources of EW and radar systems in smaller form factors and possibly in a single system along with speeding new technology into fielded systems are key goals within DoD. Nevertheless, after championing the idea more than a decade ago it has little to show for it. The technology to make this happen appears to be available now or soon will be although major challenges will obviously have to be surmounted. The other key factor as outlined in the next article is DoD’s deeply-entrenched process in which the Army, Navy, and Air Force develop systems for their own use with little or no regard for their potential application by other services. The result has been a large number of systems developed by different prime contractors that share nothing more than their intended function. As the need to provide greater functionality and performance in smaller spaces, using less power, with lighter, smaller hardware is essential, and since the DoD budget will be under the knife in the next decade or more, now is the time for change.

In the ACT approach to array development, building block array panels (a) are common for a wide variety of array applications. The array in (b) is a large array built from interconnected building block panels.

Human nature notwithstanding, orchestrating the functions of radar and EW systems with the same hardware poses fundamental problems, as these systems are vastly different in many respects. For example, radars operate at defined frequencies such as L-band, S-band, and X-band, while EW systems operate over multiple octaves of bandwidth, potentially from HF well into the millimeter-wave region. They have different performance requirements as well, from dynamic range to sensitivity, latency, RF output power, beamwidth, and many others. So achieving optimum radar and EW performance with a single system seems at the least conflicting and at worst impossible.

Both systems do however process massive quantities of data, act on them at incredible speeds, use the same type of components from active and passive RF and microwave components to analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, FPGAs, general purpose and graphics processors, data storage, and communications buses. Radar systems employ an AESA architecture and EW systems are likely to follow suit, and it is likely to make its first appearance in the Next Generation Jammer program if not sooner.

Unfortunately, this is where the similarity ends, and the first outlier is the antenna, which in both cases will be a phased array (i.e. AESA). But radar and EW will have difficulty sharing a single aperture, as their frequencies will be different so their elements will be of widely varying sizes and spacings. In addition, antennas forced to cover very broad bandwidths sacrifice gain and sensitivity, and the antenna will need to have both very wide and very narrow beamwidths. In addition to these and other technical challenges is the question of which system gets priority. That is, it is certainly possible that both systems will need to operate simultaneously, so software-delivered “what-if” scenarios must be orchestrated, which might prove unacceptable in certain circumstances.

A traditional phased array architecture on the left and the ACT version on the right.

When all possibilities have been explored, the end result may be that there is in fact no Holy Grail: systems will share components and software to the greatest extent possible, but a “one-box” solution may result in more problems than solutions. Multiple apertures and other seemingly redundant components will be required. This still would be a giant step forward, especially if these systems were designed by a team that could (and would be willing to) work together so that their end results could be used across multiple platforms and services without wholesale redesign.

Fortunately, there is now an architecture available that at least from a digital perspective provides a way to build systems using a common, COTS-based form factor: VPX. The VPX form factor (also an ANSI standard) that in its developmental form was called VITA 46 and was defined under the auspices of the VME International Trade Association (VITA), is a VME-based architecture that provides support for switched fabrics and uses a unique high-speed connector. It has broad industry support and was created for defense applications. It is compatible with VME’s 6U and 3U form factors and supports PCI mezzanine card (PMC), XMC mezzanines (PMC with high-speed serial fabric interconnect), and FMC mezzanine cards.

It is designed to be integrated with PCI Express and 10-Gigabit Ethernet and is forward-looking as it can be integrated with very-high-speed switched fabrics like Infiniband that embrace multiprocessing and local communications between multiple digital signal processors. It also embodies the ruggedness required of defense systems, various cooling schemes, general-purpose and graphics processors, DSP, FPGAs, and various attributes specific to defense applications. The OpenVPX system specification ratified by ANSI in 2010 improves on interoperability issues that resulted from the way in which VPX was created (that is, by different manufacturers instrumental in creating the standard). In short, VPX is the form factor that will drive “COTS-based systems” in the future, and will benefit any movement toward multi-function systems.

DARPA Calls for Change
DARPA has long been hammered for spending taxpayer dollars on research that is either somewhat other-worldly or produces nothing of substance. However, such is the nature of basic research, without which consumers would not have smartphones or the transistors that power them. DARPA has also had some huge successes, two of which are directly related to defense. Its MIMIC program in the 1980s drove the development GaAs MMICs and ultimately created a multi-billion-dollar industry. Its multiple gallium nitride development programs have driven this technology into the market far faster than would have been possible if industry alone was championing it.

The results of its Arrays at Commercial Timescales (ACT) program announced in the spring may not deliver the same level of results but may help pave the way to overcoming the stasis in DoD procurement that in turn may make possible multi-function systems, speed new technology into the field, and allow systems to be built with greater cross-platform utility. The goal of this multi-faceted R&D program is to create antenna arrays using COTS components that can be deployed in a “time-scale” more like that of commercial or consumer products so that technological developments can be implemented rapidly within fielded systems.

DARPA doesn’t mince words on the subject of how current systems are deployed, frankly stating that antenna arrays have “come at a severe cost in terms of system development time and the ability to upgrade capabilities in the field. Research must push past the traditional barriers that lead to 10-year array development cycles, 20- to 30-year static life cycles, and costly service life extension programs”. It also acknowledges that the gap in performance is widening between RF capabilities of fielded systems and the rapidly-evolving digital electronics that surround it. DARPA specifically calls out the need to abandon “heavily compartmentalized and ‘siloed’ array system development, procurement, and sustainment.

Participants in the ACT program will develop a digitally-interconnected building block from which larger systems can be formed, called the “Common Module”, and a reconfigurable RF interface that will be scalable and customizable for each application without a full redesign. This DARPA hopes, will end the era of “one-off” antenna array programs that do not consider reuse, because from 70% to 80% of the array’s development cycle cost will be built into the Common Module. DARPA assumes that greater digital content in RF systems can achieve an “unprecedented level of commonality between systems and across application requirements”.

ACT will demonstrate how developments in RF and digital electronics can enhance commonality of an underlying component base, and personalization of the Common Module for a specific use will include frequency, bandwidth, polarization, RF power level, scan angle, geometry, beam characteristics, and number of elements. The last facet of the program will create scalable arrays not just within one platform but across multiple platforms by stitching together array panels to generate coherent, spatially-distributed radiation and transferring data between them digitally via fiber to achieve coherent power aggregation.

In Conclusion….
The digital and RF components are ready, a form factor, signal buses and fabrics, signal processing algorithms, AESA architecture, and more or less everything else required to take a stab at creating multifunction systems are either ready now or soon could be. So the “only” missing link is the willingness on the part of DoD to change the way it does business. And that may be the greatest challenge of them all.

 

Download Digital Edition

MMD March 2014

Previous issues click here

 
 
Current Articles

3-D Printing Boresights Antenna Manufacturing
Additive 3-D manufacturing, that is, making a three-dimensional solid object of virtually any shape based on a model created in a 3-D design tool, is changing the way many products are made and who can make them.

2015 Defense Budget Retains Key Programs
On March 2, President Obama revealed the 2015 federal budget, and although in its present form it has absolutely no chance of being passed by Congress, it does contain what the Pentagon and the administration believe the US needs to maintain its strong military presence throughout the world.

No Country for Old Wart Hogs?
When federal agencies propose budget cuts, trade-offs are inevitable. The latest example comes from Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who on February 24 recommended among other things to mothball the venerable fleet of Air Force A-10 “Warthog” close-air-support aircraft and the legendary U-2, while reducing the number of Littoral Combat Ships (LCS) from 52 to 32.

3-D Printing: Growing Like a Weed
Only a few years ago, 3-D printing for the masses was essentially unknown outside of laboratories and academia, but that is changing rapidly. In fact, the use of 3-D printing to produce parts for final products is encroaching on 30% of the total number of 3-D printed parts, according to analyst firm Wohlers Associates, which has been following this market closely as long as anyone.

 
 
 
Home | About Us | Archives | Editorial Submissions | Media Kit (PDF) | Events | Subscribe/Renew | Contact Us
Copyright © 2014 Octagon Communication Inc. DBA MPDigest / MPDigest.com, All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Site Map