|
Latest
Advancements Lend Active Mixers to New, Broader Applications
By Wes Boyd, Product Marketing Manager, Skyworks Solutions,
Inc.
The latest generation of active mixers has
leapfrogged previous solutions to improve cost, power and
space efficiency while circumventing tough technical challenges,
not only in basestation transceivers, but in a growing array
of medical, scientific and industrial applications as well.
Mixers play an important role in the wireless transceiver
chain. They follow the low noise amplifier (LNA) and/or
image reject filter and translate the RF frequency to the
IF or baseband signal, which allows for easier filtering
and signal processing. While mixers haven't tended to share
the limelight very often with DSPs and integrated RF transceiver
chips, they are extremely important for optimizing wireless
system performance. Mixers are intrinsically non-linear
devices that can be thought of as a frequency multiplier
-- they work on the basis of trigonometric identity, with
two signals multiplied together. The linearity of the mixer
is a critical parameter since unwanted interferers, if not
significantly attenuated or filtered, might be mixed down
to the band of interest, and block the reception of the
desired signal.

Any nonlinear device can be adopted for frequency
translation, but the most common and best mixers until recently
were passive mixers based on high-speed switching diodes
or field effect transistors (FETs). These mixers were configured
as a bridge and driven by a high-frequency local oscillator
(LO). In these solutions, the input signal and the LO supplied
the energy for the frequency-translated output signal.
The early passive mixers were widely adopted and easy to
use. They were supplied with impedance-matched, single-ended
inputs and outputs. They also offered low-power dissipation,
low noise, and high linearity. They served a vital role
in meeting stringent requirements for transmitting a clean
signal that had a low noise floor with low intermodulation
and harmonic distortion. Their ability to provide high linearity
was particularly important because higher-order modulation
is generally required while transmitting multiple carrier
signals in basestation and other applications.
Linearity is not sufficient in and of itself, however. Besides
linearity, gain and low noise are two other important characteristics
of a mixer, and they are major determinants for receiver
noise figure and sensitivity. Designers also need a mixer
solution to deliver easy LO drive and little or no conversion
loss in order to offer the necessary cost efficiency and
performance. Passive mixers increasingly fell short in these
departments because they are inherently lossy devices. They
typically have 6 to 8 dB of conversion loss, calling for
additional amplifier gain to compensate for the loss. Because
the output signal had only about 10 to 15 percent of the
energy level of the input signal, the LO generally needed
to be a large amplitude signal to switch the diodes or FETs,
and it produced spurious electromagnetic radiation that
had to be filtered and shielded from other circuitry. This
need for high LO signals required the addition of LO amplifiers,
which also added cost and compromised isolation. Finally,
passive mixers also suffered from high sensitivity to the
LO-signal input amplitude, therefore requiring tight control
of LO signal flatness. The bottom line: passive mixers offered
good linearity at the expense of several critical disadvantages.
Active mixers provided an answer to these problems. Typically,
they were configured as double balanced current steering
topologies. The active mixer output power came from its
Dc power supply, rather than the LO. This meant that smaller,
more easily managed LO levels could be used. Also, active
mixers have an associated gain, while passive mixers can
achieve, at best, a gain of one. Finally, active mixers
can be implemented in either single-ended or differential
configurations, the latter being preferred due to their
superior ability to cancel undesired noise. These differential
configurations also are available in single- and double-balanced
configurations, the latter with the ability to eliminate
LO-to-IF and RF-to-IF feed-through, which can increase linearity
while decreasing susceptibility to supply voltage noise.
Despite their many benefits, however, active mixers weren't
initially considered suitable for high-performance infrastructure
applications like cellular basestations, or other emerging
non-cellular applications. There was too much noise, and
substandard linearity performance as compared to passive
mixers.
Other hurdles had to be cleared before active mixers could
be widely used. While they offered lower, circuitry-simplifying
LO levels, much less sensitivity to LO level variations,
and superior port-to-port isolation as compared to passive
mixers, they couldn't match the 3rd Order Input Intercept
Point (IIP3) performance and other key criteria.
To meet these needs, the latest active mixers dramatically
improve linearity while simultaneously improving such key
metrics as OIP3 performance. Today's best solutions reach
38.5 dBm for lower frequency (400 Mhz to 1 Ghz) solutions
and 35.5 dBm for higher frequency (1.7 GHz to 2.2 GHz) solutions
(see Figure 1).
Today's active mixers also offer a modest conversion gain
of 2.5 dB (1.9 GHz) and the noise figure is only 9.0 dB
when LO power is at 0 dBm. At this LO power level, the OIP3
and conversion gain are also near their respective optimal
levels, and all three parameters work together to enhance
the dynamic range. No sacrifices to NF or IP2 are needed
either when using active mixers. Considering the NF of the
passive mixer with the NF of an IF amplifier, needed to
make up for the loss of the mixer, the NF of the active
mixer is approximately the same. The differential and double
balanced nature of some active mixers also provide excellent
IP2 performance. These various advances are made possible
through the use of specialty semiconductor process technology
and the incorporation of low-noise, high-linearity transistors.
Linearity was the most important metric to improve. Breakthroughs
in active mixer linearity have been achieved through a higher
level of RF integration, which secondarily has improved
both form factor and cost through the elimination of a negative
power supply and additional amplifiers.

The latest generations of active mixers offer
ease-of-use and performance much like passive mixers, while
simultaneously providing everything that already makes active
mixers popular in lower-performance applications. They offer
inherently low-LO drive, superior LO suppression, gain,
reduced filter requirements, and easier integration. They
require 0 dBm (or less) signal to drive their LO port, as
compared to a passive mixer, which would need at least +17
dBm LO signal with its associated strong source of undesirable
radiation. At 1 GHz to 2 GHz frequencies, small PC board
parasitic elements can couple enough LO signal to adversely
affect the system's other sensitive circuits. Therefore,
passive mixers have tended to require RF shields, which
can lead to several time-consuming PC board spins. Furthermore,
the linearity performance of passive mixers can be significantly
degraded by as little as 2 dB to 3 dB of LO power change.
Leading the field of today's active mixers is Skyworks'
SKY42070 solution. An integrated, high-dynamic range, low-noise
receiver down converter, it includes a double-balanced active
mixer, LO amplifiers and dual-LO inputs selected by an external
switch interface. The LO switch function is managed using
an externally controlled complementary metal oxide semiconductor
(CMOS)-compatible interface. The SKY42068 provides an OIP3
of 38.5 dBm and an NF of 9.5 dB, and the SKY42070 features
an IIP3 of 35.5 dBm with an NF of 9.0 dB. Both devices offer
2.5 dB gain, which can potentially reduce the need for additional
gain stages. (See Figure 2).
Active mixers have come a long way since their initial debut
in lower-performance applications. Today, they deliver all
of the benefits of original passive mixers along with a
variety of new capabilities. They fundamentally disprove
the notion that active mixers cannot achieve the same linearity
as passive mixers, while offering advantages that were previously
unavailable to RF designers.
For more information, please visit www.skyworksinc.com
SKYWORKS
SOLUTIONS, INC.
www.skyworksinc.com
TXTLINX.COM 81
Email
this article to a friend!
|