Design and Implementation of a Miniature X-band Edge-Coupled Microstrip Bandpass Filter
by Cadence
Microwave bandpass filters (BPFs) are the fundamental component used in many RF/microwave applications to eliminate interference from signals operating at nearby frequencies. This application note presents a straightforward and largely nonmathematical method for designing an edge-coupled, bandpass filter for X-band operations (8.4-9.3 GHz) with a combination of filter synthesis, closed-form edge-coupled transmission-line models, and EM analysis using the AWR® Microwave Office® circuit simulator within Cadence® AWR Design Environment® software.
A miniature X-band, edge-coupled microstrip bandpass filter design example demonstrates this flow. The filter was implemented using edge-coupled microstrip lines on a Rogers RO4003 substrate material with Er = 3.66 and H = 8 mil. The temperature coefficient of dielectric constant was among the lowest of any circuit board material, and the dielectric constant was stable over a broad frequency range, specifically at X-band frequencies. The simulated results showed good filter response characteristics with the passband insertion loss approximately 5 dB and return loss greater than 12 dB over the pass bandwidth of 900 MHz.
Bandpass Filter Construction
A BPF can be constructed from resonant structures, such as a waveguide cavity or open-circuit transmission lines (i.e., stubs). An important parameter in filter design considerations is the fractional bandwidth, which is defined as the ratio of the passband bandwidth to the geometric center frequency. The inverse of this quantity is called the Q-factor. If ω1 and ω2 are the frequencies of the passband edges, then:
Parallel-coupled lines are another popular topology for printed circuit board (PCB) filters. While these resonant structures can be based on shorted or open-circuited parallel lines, open-circuit lines are the simplest to implement since the manufacturing does not require making a connection to the ground plane, often achieved through the use of vias. The design consists of a row of parallel λ/2 resonators that couple to each of the neighboring resonators, forming the topology shown in Figure 1. Wider fractional bandwidths are possible with this type of filter than with the capacitive gap filter implementation, which is formed with an in-line row of transmission lines separated by a small gap between line segments.
Conventional Chebyshev design equations were used as follows:
J-inverters
where
FBW=ω2 – ω1/ω0 (4)
Equations used for the even and odd impedance of the coupled lines were:
The widths, spaces, and lengths of the coupled line were calculated with TX-LINE calculator within AWR Design Environment. An equivalent circuit was developed for derivation of the design equations for the BPF using admittance parameter equations from Pozer [1]. Figure 2 shows the layout of (a) an N+1 section coupled line BPF, (b) equivalent circuit for each coupled line section, and (c) the equivalent circuit for transmission lines with a length of 2q. Figure 3 shows (d) the equivalent circuit for the admittance inverters, (e) the results of (c) above and (d) for the N = 2 case, and (f) the lumped-element circuit for the BPF for N = 2.
Figure 2: Development of an equivalent circuit for derivation of design equations for the BPF 
Figure 3: The equivalent circuit for the admittance inverters
Simulation Model and Results
Circuit Schematic Implementation
The filter can be modeled from closed-form coupled lines, transmission lines and discontinuity models (bends, tees, crosses, etc.). Simulation, tuning, and parameter sweeps were possible without compromising the accuracy using these circuit models. The schematic in Figure 4 was created by using the Microwave Office elements library asymmetric edge-coupled microstrip line model, which consists of the parameters W1, W2 (strip widths), S (gap between strips), and L (line length). Figure 5 provides the N = 6 order implementation on the Rogers RO4003 board, with ER = 3.66, H = 8 mil, and T = 1.
Figure 4: Layout of the BPF in Microwave Office software 
Figure 5: Edge-coupled BPF layout
The final dimensions for the schematic design in the completed TX-LINE were W1 = 0.0121 in., W2 = 0.0124 in., W3 = 0.0124 in., and W4 = 0.0124 in.
Circuit Simulation Results
The circuit schematic was simulated in Microwave Office software based on the S-parameters. Figure 6 shows the results for insertion loss and return loss based on circuit analysis using the asymmetric edge-coupled line models to define the filter network.
The insertion loss in the frequency range of 8.4 GHz to 9.3 GHz was approximately 5 dB with return loss well below 12 dB. It can also be seen from the S-parameter results that the roll-off transition between the passband and stopband is relatively sharp, thus avoiding interference from adjacent channels (stopband rejection).
EM Simulation
The AWR® AXIEM® 3D planar method-of-moments (MoM) simulator within AWR Design Environment software was used to validate the BPF design, as shown in Figures 7 and 8.
Figure 7: AXIEM EM layout with ground plane 
Figure 8: AXIEM 3D EM layout in 3D view illustrating the via fencing used to ground the shielding surrounding the BPF
AXIEM software solves for the currents on conductors embedded in a stackup of planar dielectric layers. MoM is a full-wave numerical technique that solves the integral form of Maxwell’s equations using the approximation that the dielectric layers are of infinite extent in the x-y plane.
Once the EM simulations were carried out, the calculated current density can be annotated over the entire EM structure, as shown in Figure 9.
This annotation enables the designer to specify the frequency, phase, vector components, and color scaling associated with the magnitude of the current. It also supports the use of cut planes to enable designers to investigate current densities occurring within a more complex multi-layer structure through dissection of the PCB.
The EM simulation results in Figure 10 are shown in comparison to the circuit simulation results. The EM results were very similar to the circuit results and matched exactly the performance parameters, with insertion loss in the frequency range of 8.4 GHz to 9.3 GHz with approximately 5 dB and return loss well below 12 dB.
Conclusion
A straightforward AWR Design Environment software design flow for a miniature X- band edge-coupled microstrip bandpass filter has been demonstrated. The simulated results showed good filter response characteristics with passband insertion loss of approximately 5 dB and return loss greater than 12 dB in the 900 MHz bandwidth with a center frequency of 9 GHz. The validation results using AXIEM EM simulation were in good agreement with the circuit simulation results based on the edge-coupled transmission-line models available in Microwave Office software. The performance of this BPF design at this frequency range is suitable for aerospace/defense requirements for land, airborne, and naval radar applications.
References
[1]D.M.Pozar,“Microwave Engineering,” Second Edition, Wiley and Sons, 1998.
(1501)
